• 信箱
  • 捐赠
  • 常用资源
  • 旧版网站
  • English

学术活动

首页 - 学术活动 - 正文

【学术通知】香港城市大学教授杨志林:ESG Disclosure Disparities: How Supplier Disclosure Influences Buyers’Rankings

  • 发布日期:2025-06-11
  • 点击数:

  

2025年第40期(总第1081期)

演讲主题:ESG Disclosure Disparities: How Supplier Disclosure Influences Buyers’Rankings

主讲人:杨志林 香港城市大学教授

主持人:周元元 市场营销系副教授

活动时间:2025年6月16日(周一)10:00-11:30

活动地点:管院大楼119室

主讲人简介:

杨志林,香港城市大学商学院市场营销学系教授,华人学者营销协会主席。入选斯坦福大学发布的“2022全球前2%顶尖科学家榜”,获香港城市大学“大学研究卓越奖”及商学院“研究卓越奖”。在Journal of Marketing、Journal of Marketing Research等高质量国际英文学术刊物发表110多篇论文。现任Asian Journal of Business Research主编,Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing主编,European Journal of Marketing副主编。创办了亚洲商业协会(Asian Business Association, ABA)和华人学者营销协会(China Marketing International Conference, CMIC)。

活动简介:

This study investigates how ESG disclosure disparities between suppliers and buyers influence supplier rankings and relationship stability within buyer organizations. Drawing on social network theory, dynamic relationship management frameworks, and principal-agent theory, we explore the dual-edged effects of ESG gaps on top supplier selection, retention, and governance dynamics. Using a longitudinal dataset spanning 1,416 supplier-buyer relationships across 30 industries and 11 Global Industry Classification Standard (GIC) sectors from 2017 to 2021, we find that suppliers with higher ESG disclosure relative to their buyers face challenges of initial selection due to perceived value misalignment and increased transaction costs. These same disparities, however, ultimately enhance long-term retention by reducing monitoring costs, fostering trust, and creating sustainability network capital. Furthermore, supplier and buyer eigenvector centrality play pivotal moderating roles: supplier centrality amplifies the positive impact of ESG disparities on rankings by leveraging structural power and information control, while buyer centrality diminishes these benefits by imposing governance constraints. Our findings reconcile the tension between value alignment (ESG-driven selection) and operational efficiency (cost reduction) in sustainable supply chains, introducing the "transparency paradox"—how excessive ESG disclosure can simultaneously hinder initial partnerships and strengthen long-term stability. Practically, the study highlights strategic implications for suppliers to balance disclosure strategies with network positioning while buyers must navigate power dynamics to avoid undermining collaborative ESG goals. This research advances the theoretical understanding of sustainable supply chain management and provides actionable insights for aligning ESG practices with competitive advantage.

学院要闻

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5